Sentry Page Protection

Wisdom From Teachers (Exclusive for Patrons)

We are going to focus this one on teacher and student relationships in the context of three primary areas - Practical life experience, apprenticeship, and personal (otherwise called occult) practice. Across all of these areas, gaining wisdom from teachers is a dynamic and profound process that has been a cornerstone of human education and personal growth since our ancestors' early nights and days.

Now we've all, especially during formal work training years, meaning our schooling years, likely had some stinker teachers - meaning ones that aren't very good. They could make an interesting subject boring. So we could think of this brief writing as really being "wisdom from good teachers". Because while the bad ones recede into the forgotten shadows, the good ones, of all adult ages, are memorable for a lifetime. Whether formal educators in schools and universities or informal mentors and guides, either can play a crucial role in imparting knowledge, experience, and life lessons to their students, who are usually but not always, younger in age.

The dynamic of gaining wisdom from teachers should involve key aspects such as transfer of knowledge, sharing of experiences, providing guidance, inspiring critical thinking and problem-solving, instilling ethics, as well as inspiring continuous learning which is not limited to formal education but instead extends throughout life, as individuals encounter mentors and guides in various aspects of their journey. Lifelong learning, facilitated by teachers and mentors, enables individuals to continually evolve as they face new challenges and experiences.

Practical life experience is a fundamental aspect of human development and lifelong learning not to mention a pervasive and essential aspect of human development and growth. It's often called "the school of hard knox". Encompassing a broad spectrum of situations where individuals learn from the wisdom, experiences, and guidance of others who can be anyone usually of older age - parents, siblings, aunts & uncles, grandparents, the mechanic, the mailman, the salon owner etc... This relationship is characterized by its informal learning, gradual progression, role modeling, skill transfer, feedback, passing on tradition, mutual respect, commitment and loyalty, adaptation to change, building of relationships (and potentially long term ones at that), and also learning from mistakes along with real world application, and exchange of knowledge contributing significantly to personal and professional development throughout one's life. This type of mentorship and guidance is not confined to formal educational settings but is prevalent in everyday life and virtually everyone will gain this type of teaching in their lives. Regardless of their formal schooling level. These are the types of teachings that will be inevitable. Even if you're Tarzan raised by wolves and other members of the jungle Queendom and Kingdom, there's no way you're not going to have these types of teachings with your experience in the Earth realm.

We've spoken elsewhere about the schooling system differing from the education system so see our essay entitled "Schooling is Not Education" on the subject. As formal, required, day school has not always been a thing. Public or private schooling, (“public” being “work training” and “private” usually being “better work training”) haven't always been mandatory. Prior to the days of the one room schoolhouse or homeschooling, we can look back to classical liberal art education which rose out of Ancient Greece, and then further back still to village schooling. Historically, whenever one decided to cease work training (and what's sometimes incorrectly referred to as higher education, meaning collegiate education) their base foundation schooling, oftentimes said to transition after the high school level, however that had been received - at home, or one room schoolhouse, would then be the young person, having an interest in a specific field or trade, or more likely a family connection to a specific field or trade, having them take on an apprenticeship. The teacher-student relationship is characterized by a strong focus on practical skill development and a commitment to passing on knowledge and traditions from one generation to the next. The teacher-student relationship in apprenticeships often extends well beyond the training period. Apprentices may continue to seek guidance from their mentors even after completing their formal training, fostering a long-lasting professional connection. This was always the way prior to the rather new development, coming about just within the last century, of college education being required for certain job positions in modernity. So teacher and student relationships within the context of apprenticeships is a time-honored, and you could say timeless, practical way of passing on skills, knowledge, and expertise from one generation to the next. This form of education has been crucial in preserving and advancing various professions and trades throughout history integral to various crafts and professions such as cottage industry craftsmanship, as apprenticeships existed back into the days of the renaissance artists, alchemists, tailors, trappers, and blacksmiths, (hence they are old school) and remain a valuable approach to learning and skill development in many trades to this day.

If someone is going through massive life changes, good or bad, and often bad before good, they begin searching for more out of life. Opening up to potential areas of interest they may not have previously considered. They may find some sort of new religion which they had not already been a part of, looking to clergy for teachings. Most of whom know little to nothing and may want to get in their kids pants. Or they may become more interested in conspiratorial, woo'y, new age’y material. And oftentimes looking to guru-like figures for teachings. These people are charlatans with bad fashion who just want to get in their pants and take their money. Not necessarily in that order. Further along, they may become interested in organized groups that may have mystery school style vibes, such as the Freemasons. But ultimately personal teachings must happen in a 1 on 1 dynamic, even sometimes anonymously where no one can get in each other’s pants. This isn't called their guru, or their master, or their priest, or provost, they are just referred to as their teacher. And The teacher-student relationship in the context of occult practice is a unique and complex dynamic, often characterized by its spiritual nature. Occult practices encompass a range of esoteric traditions, mystical teachings, and hidden knowledge, and the relationship between a teacher and student within this realm can take on several distinctive features: Being, like the previous two mentioned types of wisdom teachings - guidance.

In occult traditions, there is often a focus on secret or hidden knowledge that is passed down through generations. The teacher serves as the conduit for transmitting this knowledge to the student. This knowledge may include practices, rituals, developing more refined intuition, decoding of symbolism, and receiving esoteric information that is not readily accessible to the general public. All with heavy ethical considerations. Occult teachers play a crucial role in guiding and mentoring their students. They provide insights into more advanced areas of the spiritual path, offer instruction on occult practices, and help students navigate the complexities of other metaphysical realms which happen internally. This mentorship can extend beyond mere academic instruction to include personal and spiritual development, including and most importantly real imitation which must happen through a teacher who has already undergone a similar initiation. This is not possible without a good and very hard to find teacher. Who wisely guides students in the correct execution of these practices, emphasizing their significance and symbolism. Teachers provide students with tools and insights to help them explore their inner selves, increase self-discovery, uncover hidden truths, and evolve spiritually. This transformative journey can be deeply personal and may involve confronting one's own shadows and limitations. So occult teachings come with an element of secrecy, discretion, and trust. Both teachers and students are bound by oaths of confidentiality to protect the integrity of the teachings and the individuals involved. This secrecy is seen as a way to preserve the power and purity of the knowledge. Some occult traditions have hierarchical structures, with various degrees of initiation and mastery. Teachers often guide students through these levels, imparting progressively deeper knowledge and wisdom as students advance in their spiritual journey. In occult practices, the goal is not just to follow a teacher blindly but to empower the student to become an independent practitioner. Like any other form of mentorship, the effectiveness of this relationship relies on mutual respect and the alignment of the teacher's and student's goals and values. The teacher-student relationship within occult practice is a profound and spiritual connection that involves the transmission of rarely known, mostly hidden knowledge, and guidance for personal and spiritual development.

The relationship between teachers and students is a symbiotic one, as both parties can benefit from the exchange of wisdom and the pursuit of knowledge. As it’s been said that in order to really learn, one must teach, so the naive student must one day go onto becoming the wise teacher. We’ve once said “the quality of one's life is the quality of their questions' '. Which we would extend into saying “the quality of one's life is the quality of their teachers who we can ask those questions to. And be provided with good answers.”

Written Essay: Pro-Democracy Series #9: Nested Cults

This is the 9th essay in our pro-democracy series. Yes, it’s been a long while since the 8th episode, as we’ve come to find it much easier with how our life is currently structured to output shorter insight episodes in the meantime, as it really takes us 2/3 days to write and record a full 5 to 10 (or more) page essay and we all know how few of us with jobs, family, etc get that much free time to ourselves in modernity. And for this 9th of at least 25 essays on the subject, as perhaps we can think of this as a slow written book where each one is essentially a chapter, we’re heading over to not only talking about cults but nested cults. Otherwise known as, cults within cults, or one cult that predicates another cult.

The word cult itself through history has had a neutral connotation. Historically, it has more or less meant “a community of worship and/or ritual” regardless of what civilization or system that may have been within. Most early cults were likely neutral that any member could leave at any time. But over time the definition has primarily adjusted into a pejorative of being “a group which one joins that puts undue influence upon them and is something they can't leave without pain.” Since cults have existed on a continuum from healthy ethical influence to unhealthy non ethical influence, in modernity there are both non-destructive cults but also far too many destructive ones.

We've mentioned before that one of the biggest traps that people sink down into when on the spiritual path (and if you don’t like the word spiritual, simply switch it out for growth path, or improvement path, or development path), is getting into a cult. But what is often the case is that someone is born into a cult, which then has a knock on effect driving them getting into a secondary cult, followed by a tertiary cult etc.... and like Matryoshka dolls, otherwise known as Russian dolls, we will be focusing on three specific cults nested within one another in this essay.

People get brought into a cult thinking they are doing the right thing. For at initial glance, cults can seem to offer a sense of identity, discipline, knowledge, community, or opportunity. Yet, once being brought in, destructive cults use something called the BITE model, which stands for “Behavior, Information, Thoughts, Emotions” to manipulate one’s mind, heart, and will through thought reform. Creating a group with us vs them thinking, where members come to believe that anyone in the group is good and anyone outside the group is bad.

There are levels to cult indoctrination and programming and the longer one has been in a cult, sadly the deeper they have sunk. When people are deep in a single damaging cult or nested damaging cults, they don’t want the truth. They want to live in the illusion and lies of Plato’s cave. Because in order to be true they must transition through the looking glass of realizing that the foundations their supposed truths were built on are actually based in half truths at best our stacked lies at worst. It’s way easier to double down, or triple down, or quadruple down on their previously inaccurate cult programming. Because looking at the foundation of illusions and lies is too painful. Better to continue to live in echo chambers of more lies. For when one is in a mind control cult they are not allowed to think independently or critically, they must parrot the cults programming. They must replace their pre-cult impressionable self with a cult identity.

One of the most difficult things in the world will wise, meaning what one decides to do, is for those who have sunk down into groups that discourage individual thoughts, and encourage group think and use such indoctrination, to instead spiritually grow through the steps of admitting that what they’ve started in is incorrect, negative, wrong, or damaging. They don’t want to acknowledge that they’ve been lied to, manipulated, and exploited. They don’t want to be told that they are in a destructive cult, or multiple damaging cults which predicate one another, and they don’t want to admit that course correction is needed, they certainly would never want to read or listen to this essay, and they will at time fight to the death to prevent themselves from being unplugged from their false reality. Sadly a lot of people in a single cult, let alone multiple nested cults, will never be free of them. Leaving is the last thing they ever want to do and they will ultimately continue their de-evolution. But for those who have the will and development to acknowledge that they have been the fool card from tarot, those people always need to be talked to with compassion and care, even those who have replaced their old self with a new cult self or never knew who their real non-cult self was in the first place. This is the path of life growth, which is hard. As we often say, the human mind is a very complex thing and one can only work on their own mind for themselves through their heart and will. Hopefully with the help of compassion and caring via friends or family, but, just like kicking heroin, doing so or removing oneself from a cult can ultimately only primarily be done through the individual's own will.

Cult Layer 1 - The Religious Cult

One definition of cult is “usually a small group of people characterized by heavy devotion.” This can exist across all extremes of a political spectrum. As extreme ideologies can certainly be either extreme left or extreme right. The “Symbionese Liberation Army'', who kidnapped and indoctrinated Patty Hearst in the 1970’s would be an example of a far left cult. We know someone who got very devoted at first to living for a time at Gilliland's ESCETI Ranch. It is/was a hippy style community in rural Washington state that is/was probably so left wing its right wing that claims/claimed to be a hot bed for paranormal activity and supposed frequent UFO sighting. After realizing it was a UFO cult, and a not very large one at that, they and their partner went through severe mental damage and PTSD trying to leave and decouple themselves from the years they spent there. It was very difficult and painful for them.

But if you think cults are just small woo like organizations think again, because no one has done cults for such extended periods of time and at such large scales as dogmatic, organized, big religion - which is extreme male patriarchal hierarchy on steroids. Primarily in the East in the form of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, and in the West via primarily Judaism, Catholicism, and Christianity. Can folks be litely in these systems in a non-destructive non-pejorative sense of the word, of course. Is everyone in these systems in a cult in the negative pejorative sense of the word. Of course not. Especially if they keep it primarily personal. We personally are not screaming to the hills with our study or praxis in our two main spiritual systems which we find vastly superior to these other systems because their based in nature and not male authority hierarchy and instead focus on direct experience over just faith and the improvement of the individual instead of conforming to group ideologies - which are entheogenic shamanism and Hermetic alchemy. Short of sharing insights regarding in our films or writings, we keep both primarily personal and lite.

Many quote un quote “religious people” in the world who have the volume turned down into the personal for their faith, solely using it for their own development, or as community building at a Sunday gathering, or for a lite moral framework are the type of folks who don’t get caught in the binary trap of my religion good, other religions bad. But instead want equal opportunity for both women and men, agree with science, agree with evolution, can be sympathetic to all the world’s spiritual practices (some of which many are within structured faiths), and others are not and as a result have much less dogma. There are plenty of humane modest churches that allow their members to have the ability to think critically. Even though still patriarchal and incorrectly thinking God is only 1/2 of the two sexes, these are still superior, more embracing to women and more accepting of gay people churches and are not destructive and their members are allowed to come or go. But it’s important for very smart secular people to realize that a large percentage of the world, and this is definitely true for the United States, are religious in a heavy way. From birth!

Since the numerous uno problem in the world is shit parenting, far too many parents indoctrinate their children into heavy fanatic religious dogma from birth. With an underlying foundation in a destructive religious cult. This indoctrination into heavy big religion is so strong that someone will spend their whole life not questioning the operating system that has come pre-installed on their mental hard drive. And especially in more rural America, much of red America grows up their entire adolescence and into adult life with their social lives being based only around their church environment. So if the church is love and lite then fine - all good. But if it’s a hate church filled with guilt and shame, then it’s a destructive cult that is incredibly painful to try and leave. So to leave the church would require leaving many or not all of your friends and family who are also in the cult. In much of rural USA, your church is your whole social scene and is thus the control point of one's social environment. So if one leaves the church, they must leave all of it. Easier to just give up your free will. This is often why well educated, well studied in history folks are often secular, because while dogma can also exist in science, they have matured to focusing on the fact that morality and being a good person comes primarily from open minded good parenting that allows children to arrive at what they want on their own time rather then pre-installing a heavy membership in a religion. Which likely comes with so much extra potential baggage.

In the book "Critical Thinking: An Introduction to Reasoning Well" by Jamie Carlin Watson and Robert Arp, it discusses the concept of social conditioning and its impact on people's beliefs and thinking processes. Stating: “The overwhelming preponderance of people have not freely decided what to believe, but, rather, have been socially conditioned (indoctrinated) into their beliefs. They are unreflective thinkers. Their minds are products of social and personal forces they neither understand, control, nor concern themselves with. Their personal beliefs are often based in prejudices. Their thinking consists largely of stereotypes, caricatures, oversimplifications, sweeping generalizations, illusions, delusions, rationalizations, false dilemmas, and begged questions. Their motivations are often traceable to irrational fears and attachments, personal vanity and envy, intellectual arrogance and simple-mindedness. These constructs have become a part of their identity.” And this is nowhere more true than within heavy religious indoctrination.

This is most heavily seen in the United States within the extreme religious loudness of the Christian Right. Which should be called the christian wrong because they don’t like or respect other faiths, hate thy gay neighbor instead of love thy gay neighbor, and anyone who isn't a WASP, and protect the top of the socio-economic hierarchy instead of the bottom. So basically they pretend to honor the love based Christos teachings but do generally the opposite. While promoting Christian nationalism which is really just christian supremacy. John Pavlovitz, writer, former non hate pastor, & activist says “I Would rather be excluded for the people I include, than included for the people I excluded.

The Christian wrong is a minority percentage of the population. And although church attendance has been steadily dropping over the decades within the US, dark imperial hate churches still make up a sizable percentage, at least 25% in a very religious country slanted and want absolute power with actually less religious freedom. So even though 75% or more of the population are a pro-democracy coalition, regardless of their secular or more moderate to litely religious stance, this dark minority sector wants an oppressive Hainmaide’s Tail fascist theocracy, and the way they promote that is through right wing policies which protect the top of the socio economic hierarchy and lead us into the second cult.

Layer 2 - The Political Red Cult

We would never in a thousand years put shamanic and hermetic on the info section of our social media profile. Cause we don’t claim to be a shaman or an alchemist while also keeping it lite and for the most part, outside of what we share in our creative outputs, personal. But when someone puts Christian, Conservative, right front and center in their social media profile, you can tell they are very heavy with it because it’s their whole identity. And what they are doing is signaling to other cult members that they are in their same multiple cults.

Alchemy is a very evolutionary based science which teaches us that most if not all things in binary reality, meaning the physical world, have on the lower end, dysfunction at best or corruption at worse - both physically and mentally. And the purpose of alchemy is to, through a rotary evolutionary process, remove dysfunction. You wouldn’t be here as a developing soul if you didn’t have problems to work through, with things to improve upon and one day, shall we say - perfect. And a lazy statement would be to say, “politics is corrupt” or “all politicians are corrupt.” Politics is, in a democracy, messy yes, and still dysfunctional yes, but if working on behalf of the middle class, can progress a society through compounding good decisions that work to improve the lives of the proletariat - meaning the working people. So democracy, in that regard, has value, should result in the progressing and evolving of a civilization, and should always be worked on improving. But evolution can be painfully slow and in a country with only two real political parties which have a chance of getting into office, there during our lifetime has not been a symmetrical level or corruption between the two parties in the United States but instead one's heavy corruption influencing the others lesser corruption. While the left in the US certainly has some corruption, it pales in comparison to the corruption of the right. It is a very asymmetrical comparison. While the problem with blue America, and especially the democrats, which we are not a member of but acknowledge they are less corrupt and dysfunctional than Republicans, is at times some of them can be too much like virtually all Republicans. Which primarily protects oligarchic wealth and power. Since the American left wing is superior to the American right wing, which is inferior, we're going to focus on two right wing cults.

Even after the January 6th domestic terrorist attack (and terrorism is using violence for political influence or gain) on the US capital after the beautiful, beautiful, beautiful 2020 United States presidential election, some more moderate, members of the Republican Party (even though moderates within the party are an endangered species because of our soon to be discussed third cult) who realized it was wrong and a heavy threat to democracy for trying to stage an insurrection, said they would never vote for the opposition party. And instead had to come up with fairy tales of a “fed-surrection” and said they would still vote for the same people who were responsible for said attack. Why? Because they are in a political cult. Which would be too painful to mature into leaving because then they have to admit it has been wrong the whole time.

Cults work from the top down. Usually but not always around one leader. The problem with the red part of America, which is lead by the GOP otherwise called the Republicans, is that they are a top of the hierarchy cult, historically being subservient to robber barons and corporate greed, which is primarily learned through a hierarchy of men cult - being their very staunch religious stances. Not all right wing people are heavily religious, but the more right wing someone is, the more likely they are to also be pushing their religion on others. So as said in previous essays in this series, when you are said to be born into sin, and spend your whole childhood being taught to be subservient to sky daddy, and sky daddy’s son, and being taught to be scared of the red firey man underground, that hierarchy of men programming, combine with getting power dad downloads from a macho cowboy father figure, makes one much more susceptible to only caring about those at the top of the hierarchy. Which are the morbidly rich. So when your policies over the decades have primarily only represented the top 1% of income earners, as red America’s has, and screw everyone else, you have to fib about your intentions. You have to spend decades building a propaganda media machine that spews 24/7 lies with statements like “coastal liberal elites'' (even though over 50% of the US population live within 50 miles of a coastline), and inflate bullshit cultural wars to get the masses fighting against each other while your robber baron friends rob the people’s coffers. And because of top down cult dogma, being so sure you’re right about your stance the higher up the hierarchy, the better, the lower the worse, in a democratically limited constitutional republic with a constitution which is suppose to represent “We The People” meaning all the people, which also include the people in the middle of the hierarchy and the not just white but also black and brown poor people in the bottom of the hierarchy, you have to turn into ultra tribal professional liars. See our insights series regarding the L-Curve of income distribution on the subject. And regarding the leading edge of lies, this leads us into the third cult.

Layer 3 - The Conspiracy Cult

Now when someone puts on their social media profile, Christian, Conservative, then #WWG1WGA with multiple American flags then they are announcing that they are not only in one cult, or two cults, but thrice cults. It’s turtles of cults all the way down.

When we were 12 or 13 years old, we saw Donal Trump in the crap movie Home Alone 2. We would later see him in our late 20’s at the US open in New York City in the early 2000’s. All we knew about him when we were a teenager is he was a slimy schlockmeister business man who had gotti gold everything in his NYC penthouse, showed up to classless World Wrestling Federation and plastic miss USA pageant events, and was the textbook example of everything wrong with Corporate American financial greed. He was also obviously a crap un-loyal cheating husband who had been married numerous times (divorce could be said to be very un-Christian btw) and as we got into our early 20’s it was obvious he was a clear conman and ignoramus. In our 30’s it became more obvious he was just an outright fraud and criminal who runs everything he’s ever been a part of into the ground, being a chaos agent and destroyer. Then into our 40’s we’ve come to realize that he’s a sociopathic, narcissistic, grifting, dog whistling, gaslighting, bottomless human. Not to mention at the time of this writing, an adjudicated rapist. And let’s not bullshit, Neo Natzi’s have been delighted to vote for him so that tells one everything they need to know about his messaging on civil rights.

Yet into the present time of this writing and speaking two primary traits about him have become more and more clear to us. The first is that if there’s one trait that defines Trump more than any other, it is that he is a liar. It’s been fact checked that he told more than 30,573 misleading or factually inaccurate statements over his term and those continue every day for the short remainder of his life. He’s always been a con man, and with his daddy money has only been able to fail upward through endless lies. So lying is all he knows how to do. So the party of professional liars now has a lie with almost every breath slob as their Emperor. While the other trait that defines him is that he is a talented cult leader spreading a dangerous mental illness to his weak willed supporters. Knowing what buttons to push and what lies to tell to turn on the ears of those with authoritarian leanings. Trump is the reigning world champion of something in debate called the “Gish Gallop.” Which is a method of outmaneuvering rhetorical opponents with an overwhelming onslaught of dubious arguments. Essentially just talking over someone with a fire hose of lies, which is challenging to respond to because in classical debate you’re supposed to respond to each of your opponents specific arguments with counter arguments. Even Mark Burnett and other people primarily responsible for creating the garbage reality TV show, “The Apprentice”, which revitalized Trump in the early 2000’s, knew he was a fraud back then, but also a talented blabbing gish galloper and thus mental exploiter. Thus perfect for trash television.

This is probably true in all countries throughout the world, but the worst part of America is we’ve always had an asshole problem. The least nice, most mean people - who are the liars, extractors, and authoritarians, otherwise known as the assholes, are always trying to gain power. If we look back at history, the confederate South, who then didn’t want to transition out of chattel slavery for Africans, would be an example. The GOP, because of their 40+ years of Reaganomic golden shower economics that hollow out the middle class, have created an environment where someone like Trump can come into their top down group not as a cause but as a symptom of America’s middle class financial struggles. Then their members look to all the wrong places for terrible solutions. Rather than focusing on reducing the gap between abject poverty and the tiny sliver of aristocratic morbid wealth, from the middle out, the authoritarian cult members solutions are to look upwards toward the top of the economic hierarchy to a corrupt robber baron, (who literally named his son Barron after the robber barons) and who doesn’t give two shits about those below him. So the problem that the Republicans now have is there is an authoritarian anti democratic loyalty cult of hardcore assholes which has taken over their party, and is purging anyone who’s got some remaining shred of decency left from the remainder of the party. Named the MAGA cult, which stands secondarily for “Make Attorney’s Get Attorneys'', which we’ll get into the importance of the natural guardrails of democracy, the courts later in this series, but primarily stands for “Manipulating America’s Gullible Assholes.” It’s a non-original stale fart rehash of Ronald Wilson Regan’s (6 letters 6 letters 6 letters) campaign slogan, and make no mistake is a fascist cancer now embedded into the party.

So when you’re not in a wrong wing authoritarian cult, let alone multiple wrong wing nested authoritarian cults, all of these accurate traits about Trump we stated earlier, and could already see when we were still a kid, are obvious. But when one is in these cults, they think 180 degrees the opposite. They think he’s hand picked by fictional white Republican Jesus for the highest office in the land. They think the worst person for the job is the best, and the best person for the job is the worst. Everything is mirror back to front. Because fascism, through all of history, has only been able to exist within an endless soup of lies stacked upon lies, from cults within cults.

Fredrick Clarkson writes in his book “Eternal Hostility - The Struggle Between Theocracy and Democracy” that it would only be a matter of time where such a top down party would allow such a type of person to infect it. The GOP, has now transmuted from heavy corruption to near full corruption - becoming the GQP. With theocracy, nested in regressive backwards politics, nested in shadow conspiracy, resulting in a 5 alarm clown show dumpster fire that can’t tell the truth, let alone legislate on behalf of “We The People” because it's infested with MAGA and QAnon. A far-right conspiracy theory that alleges a secret plot against Donald Trump by a "deep state" of government officials, celebrities, and other prominent figures. The theory is based on cryptic messages posted online by an anonymous user or group of users known as "Q." These messages, which started appearing on forums in the toilet sewers of the internet, 4chan and 8chan in 2017, and had been consistently incorrect in their forecasting, often predicted future events or claim to have insider knowledge of government operations. QAnon followers believe, and remember believe has LIE in the middle of the word, that Trump was waging a secret war against this supposed deep state, which they beLIEved is involved in various nefarious activities, including child trafficking, Satan worship, and attempts to undermine their orange hutt emperor. It’s also a loyalty cult to Trump, Putin, and other wanna be dictators, with no room for questions or criticism of the malignant narcissist cult leaders who are said to never do any wrong.

We are very 50/50 on conspiracy. Having been a guest on what is likely one of the world’s top conspiracy podcasts called “The Higherside Chats” related to a past project, we will absolutely acknowledge that the world is not how you initially were taught it to be. And thus some conspiracies are accurate, such as countries doing what’s called false flags as pretexts for war. But the 10,000 foot is that a conspiracy is accurate if it’s on behalf of the oligarchs, and not accurate if it’s not helping the oligarchs. The thing about conspiracy that boggles the mind, is the accurate identification of problems, that yes there are secret things going on behind the scenes, followed immediately by bat shit crazy solutions being proposed to such problems. A conspiracy theory claiming such a bottomless human being who became a TV show con man is the savior of the republic is so dumb it’s mind boggling.

Yet the deeper one goes into it, the darker it gets. Being a closed authoritarian loop where truth doesn’t matter. Only a dark imperial theocracy with deep capacity to hate. With anything from not their MAGA ideology being said to be deep state fake news which is textbook cult programming. Being a hall of mirrors of misinformation and rocket fuel for inciting violence. Thrice cultists Q’s have literally called for executions of their opponents which literally sound like they’re from out of the first crusade from nearly 1000 years ago. In 2020, the FBI identified QAnon as a domestic stochastic terrorism threat, citing the theory's role in inspiring violent incidents and its ability to radicalize individuals.

Watching people we’ve known from the alternate media sphere or even some past acquaintances, friends, and colleagues get sucked down into the QAnon joker spiral has been deeply disappointing to us. We have a friend, a woman, who was literally engaged to a guy who then wisely broke off the marriage cause she came to find out he was a QAnon lunatic. We have another friend, a man, who hasn’t spoken to his kooky sister in over 5 years cause she’s so deep in the cult. And we suspect you have a similar story… The Reddit thread “Q-Anon Casualties” contains story, after story, after story, of families separated or destroyed because of souls lost to QAnon, in which people share their pain and suffering caused by friends and family who have had their pre cult selves replaced with cult selves to the cancer’s cultist mutation. Some of which will leave the cult, but many of which sadly will never return. We understandably do not waste time on someone deep in thrice cults that we know have been hollowed, so we can instead focus on those on the vile or returning from the event horizon of the black hole of cults and away from toxicity to come back up into the realm of critical thinking. We’ve also called it a death cult, because like Milton William Cooper, a UFOlogist and conspiracist who wrote the book “Behold a Pale Horse” which we have read and became one of the conspiracy bibles, chose to clock out via a harrowing shootout with the sheriff's department rather than just pay his federal taxes, some members of the cult will continue to go to jail for QAnon lies or even win the Ashley Babbitt award and die on behalf of QAnon. Jim Jones cult clock out style.

While QAnon and MAGA both deserve zero respect, to give some credit to more moderate conservatives, which do deserve respect, many of which have switched to become independents, there have been members of the Republican Party who are in only cult #1 and cult #2 but not in cult #3 and have spoken out against cult #3. While many of them are too cowardly to speak out against cult #3, it must be understood the pro-democracy movement is not as much a liberal vs conservative issue but more a pro-democracy vs authoritarianism issue, and those on the front lines, which are those within red America whose party is the primary threat to democracy, must continue to leave. Just like the "Chrisitans in Name Only" that hide within Christianity, many authoritarian who hate democracy hide within conservatism, but that certainly doesn't mean all conservatives are not pro-democracy. Because MAGA could be said to not even be conservative. Instead it’s mainly just fascism mixed with idiocracy, who don’t like members not in their cult voting.


Insight - Why Esotericism is Important Part 3: Initiation and Hierarchy

Our obscure personal work revolves around our own system focused around personal growth, life balance, and creativity - No one can even remotely discuss personal growth without living in a free and open society. Which is only done by decades of good choices and wisely choosing who are those that are hierarchically in charge of said type of society. Because the quality of the populous should be a direct reflection on the quality of its lawmakers. We are for progress in the sense that we want a society from the bottom up with a strong middle class allowing said class to be (internally) growing and improving and leaders who cater to that. However, many regressive people don't want that. They want an extremely hierarchical society under their version of God and their version of a dictator and whatever they say goes. But what is the real true quality of those at the top of that hierarchy? That question, and its framing, we always will deconstruct and challenge and as a result suspect we do a great deal of pissing off regressive people who protect the top of the hierarchy. 

Maslow's Hierarchy of needs, which we will donate a future insight to talking about exclusively, is depicted as hierarchically a pyramid with five levels. The hierarchy suggests that individuals are motivated to fulfill these needs in a sequential manner, with lower-level needs taking precedence over higher-level ones. The basic level is food and shelter, moving up to safety, community, family, solid finances, and then when those things are good, only then can one move onto personal development and some level of self-actualization. Another subject we will talk about in a separate insight. But basically, it means being able to pursue your personal passions, creativity, and self-fulfillment. 

What is happening there, is that one is moving from less and less lower level primate functions, to higher level functions. And the ultimate goal of this process is to move from being dysfunctional, to functional. From being more and more an honorable, creative, perfected being. Which one can only do on themselves at an individual level. Which is allowed through a life through good parenting or positive role models and positive life experiences not excluding a series of initiations in life, some of which we briefly touched on in the last insights. This is the true and important hierarchy - the one that is the route of personal development of the mental capacity of the individual. Not what someone's position is above or below others in terms of money or control and one of the big cons is to outsource your own hierarchical development to others. Meaning one does not have to do anything, so this other authority figure can supposedly do it for them. Because if you are heavily dysfunctional, you will choose heavily dysfunctional people to be in charge of your own destiny. 

On a societal level, we have always said that it is important to have a healthy skepticism of authority and while maintaining honorability, also not outsource one's own authority. In sophisticated advanced conscious society, one has to go through this developmental hierarchy, individually, to be worthy of being higher up a hierarchy, on a societal level. Meaning being able to be in charge of large amounts of other people. If the authority, such as a parent when you are young, is honorable, and respectable, then part of you being honorable is to reciprocate both of those things back. But the problem with adult life in the world in the 2020's, is that many people in charge are still far too often the opposite of honorable and are instead criminal psychopaths just hungry for money and power. They are un-honorable, egotistical, and simply want control over others to maintain their own power and selfish ends. Any dictator throughout history would be a prime example. Vladimir Putin would be a modern day example. Who is a highly dysfunctional, to the point of having extreme corruption, authoritarian dictator that has enormous wealth and dark power over others. 

In terms of being the opposite of that - honorable, and being of the highest moral virtue, which we should not only expect but require from our leaders, this is where initiation comes in. Which is a massive other story but what we can say here is the further you go in it the more of a developed and honorable human being you become. There's a lot of larping going on out there in terms of said subject (meaning people just pretending they are doing it when they are really not) but in terms of real higher level initiation, and how it works, which we have some insight regarding, is not for public consumption. It is of the deepest esoteric and occult means and the way it works and what it does we don't want in the hands of dark imperial agents who are in bed with authoritarians. But what we will say here is, going through it is like a death and rebirth experience. To be rebooted as the Phoenix. The extreme importance of it is that what it does is move someone from lower level functions, which is where maslow's hierarchy ends, to the highest levels of self development into then being run by their higher level functions. And when one moves from lower to higher, they cease to be as dysfunctional. No longer having a desire to thirst for power, especially around the accumulation of money, but instead use their internal hierarchical development, which they received through initiation and experiential work, to be then applicable for guidance on others to do the same. Because only when one is no longer as dysfunctional, only then are they worthy of being societally in charge of the top of the exoteric hierarchy.

Over centuries, initiatory lineage had to go underground and who was in charge became only about bloodlines. The problem with the aristocracy without initiation is they are extremely dysfunctional and thus corrupt people who should not be in charge of making a ham sandwich, let alone running a country. When real initiation was lost, queens and kings throughout history were no different than modern day authoritarians who were horrendous deplorable people who cared only for themselves. And the people under them suffered. In the past, in more advanced civilizations that had no war, they had democratic like systems where wize initiated elders were in charge. This was often a group of both matriarchs and patriarchs. A council if you will. At other times, in a higher level, honorable, society with a lineage of real initiation, the Ancient Egyptians for example, were obsessed with initiation and built giant structures to help partake in the initiatory practice. If one goes far enough back even beyond Egypt, and gets the real history and mystery of it, the accurate John Anthony West version of it not the inaccurate Zahi Hawass version of it, in said initatory societies, there at times had been one or two main people in charge, such as a king or queen if you will, that were not dictatorial authoritarian, but instead philosophers.

Democracy can be very sloppy and inefficient. And having a system where one person or a small council of people are instead calling the shots can be incredibly efficient in causing change. But the only way in a trillion years that a kingdom works well, being in any way slightly analoge to the Disney fairytale version of queendom + kingdom where both the queen and kind were honorable people - kind, compassionate, and caring, and cause positive change for everyone is if both the queen or king were philosopher queens and philosopher kings. Who were not only educated to the highest level, but actualized to higher levels, and most importantly, esoterically initiated to a higher level. With their sense of ego dissolved to the point where they had realized, that every soul in their kingdom we're all one. Only then structurally it made sense to have a few initiates running the show, because they made the best decisions which honored the interests of everyone in the society, not just themselves. 

Written Insight - Why Esotericism is Important Part 2: Initiation

In the insight where we touched on esotericism we said the words "knowledge for the initiated few". To talk about the initiated aspect of that phrase, initiation can be said to be "to cause or facilitate the beginning of : set going - To begin something new." This happens first at an individual level, and then when there are enough initiates, their changes can eventually have a knock on effect, applying to the aggregate.

There are different levels of initiation. But as a culture and society, even in a more free and open democratic society, which you could argue is not yet really democratic but still mainly autocratic and plutocratic, we have no real higher level initiation for young people. Some of us can have multiple lower level initiations through our lifetimes. Which used to be having to live on your own in the wilderness like getting pro at bushcraft. But more modern versions are to cease being a couch potato by traveling abroad for an extended period, or volunteering with an organization doing honorable good work, all of which can be life transformative. But beyond that all we really have are initiations into the school of hard knox of young people having to learn how to support themselves - Living on their own for the first time, starting a job in the professional workforce, etc... and that's basically it till you die.

One of our problems with our dysfunctional culture is that we often lack maturity. Where we have adults that essentially act like children their whole lives. Especially when put out of their comfort zone. The native Americans knew of the importance of the spirit quest where young people would go off and have a life changing experience for betterment and improvement at an individual level, and when coming back from said spirit quest, just as the Hobbits returning to the shire, they were forever changed for the better transitioning from children to mature adults, individuals bettering themselves to thus better the tribe. What is important here is the maturity aspect, and sadly we often have children who never really mature into adulthood. Let alone becoming mature loving adults. So society does not evolve as much as it could as a result.

In terms of the aggregate - meaning "constituting or amounting to a whole; total", we do deserve credit having made it through past civilization level initiations as things progress, such as the use of agriculture, or abolishing overt slavery (now we just have covert slavery in the form of human trafficking), or more modern examples such as the standardization of seatbelts in cars, or disposing of waste in bins and trash cans, where even the most regressive elements of society rarely fall below that level anymore, but what we don't have are medium let alone higher level initiations into higher states of being. More coming to know thyself.

In our currently heavily overloaded technological world we've heavily decoupled from higher level initiations into nature and thus spirit. Ask an indigenous person what's wrong with the technologically advanced modern world, not the organically advanced world, and they will say we need to re-connect to spirit and nature. This is what climate change and climate chaos are really about. Which are a species level initiation, forcing us to fix our shit, having to evolve or perish, grow up or die. We also evolved through initiations at a cultural level to the point where most everyone now sees the benefits of having a vegetable garden at least or doing some sort of permaculture, eating naturally, etc... but since that's exoteric, for the body, what are the further esoteric initiations for the mind, spirit, or soul? Those types of nature based initiations happen through esoteric and occult means at primarily an individual level on an individual's phycology. Having a meditation practice is one example. Because if you help improve yourself, meaning improving your mind, you help improve the world.

Also, as the co-creator of a documentary series on indigenous medicine and mental healing, we agree with Graham Handcock's idea that any politician should be required to be initiated into drinking Ayahuasca 10 times just to even be considered for office. That should be like step 3 of 10 and if you're brainwashed into thinking that's in any way a hippy thing to say, think again. As sane civilizations throughout history/mystery had their people go through initiations into higher states for thousands of years. Look at the Kykeon at Elusus. Which was likely done for well over a 1000 years if not more like 2, in ancient Greece and made those who went through it more mature, more sophisticated, more compassionate, more conscious, more nature connected human beings.

So, the next one will give an ever so slight insight into the top tier level of initiation, and how it affects hierarchy and thus who runs and administers modern society.

Written Insight - Why Esotericism is Important Part 1: Cause & Effect

In the last two insights we spoke very briefly about occultism and esotericism and in this one we'll highlight why we're even mentioning them at all before we move onto other things - primarily focusing on the esoteric because the occult is so loaded. Although this is a subject that multiple books could be written on, and we will give at least three examples regarding esoteric importance, this being the first, which is that "the inside is the cause, the outside is the effect". With everything in life. So, if you look at the world out there, why does everything seem so F'ed up?

Well, it is not all that way, that's usually legacy media trying to keep you in a constant state of fight or flight to increase their ratings. Many things actually are better than they have ever been. Go back to our great great great great grandparents generation and see how they lived brutally difficult lives compared to ours. Much of which has been improved by technological advancements, which move very fast, and structural and systemic political improvements, which move at a snail's pace by grassroots movements such as the civil rights movement and are always trying to be eroded by authoritarians, oligarchs, and their astroturf zombies. But to simplify the problems with culture and society today, looking at things from a higher philosophical level, is that we have essentially a mental health crisis in various degrees on an individual level, which manifests in various degrees of a mentally unhealthy culture and society. For example, a species that engages in imperialism, colonialism, and wars is deranged enough, but when that culture in times of peace still fracks the water table, harpoons whales, and clear cuts the rainforest, it is obviously still very sick.

In psychology, the concept of cause and effect refers to the relationship between events or variables where one event (the cause) produces another event (the effect). Understanding cause-and-effect relationships is fundamental to comprehending various psychological processes, behaviors, and outcomes. Any psychologist or therapist will know that when someone has a recurring problem in their life, it almost always stems from trauma in their youth. And the damage done to them, even if not physical and just mental, will externally manifest later in their life. Sometimes even in regards to physical symptoms. But you can't solve the external exoteric effects, without getting to the underlying esoteric internal causes of why they are happening in the first place.

For example, because 2024 is the year the USA either decides to keep its democracy or stupidly throws it in the trash can for a reality TV con man and his loyalty cult, which we'll be talking a lot more about this year, so strap in, here are two stories of two fathers and sons, in 20 seconds each. Hunter Biden had extreme family trauma of having his mother and sister killed in front of him in a car accident when he was a baby and his brother later dying of brain cancer. Both of which were not from damage by his loving father but his dad, Joe Biden's, understandable depression as a result and his own struggles with substance abuse, including taking contractive street narcotics such as meth which rotted his teeth, and then resulted in his long benders and taking regrettable nude pictures of himself with tattooed and pierced call girls. But even though he is very flawed, he has also worked to heal himself with expansive shamanic medicines, one of which, the toad medicine, is smoked out of what is essentially a crack pipe. But he's not a crackhead, because that was 5-MeO-DMT he was smoking, which is arguably the strongest entheogen on the planet. See the first episode of our documentary series Shamans of the Global Village for visuals on this entheogen being used with that delivery mechanism.

And the other 20 second story is that Fred Trump Sr. was such a loveless horrible abusive authoritarian cut throat father, who told his children that losing anything in life was unacceptable and they had to do whatever they could, lie, cheat, con, steal to rise up the wealth hierarchy to earn even a modicum of his approval that Fred Jr. was so damaged by it that he drank himself to death and Donald was so mentally weak willed at losing his re-election to the office he disgraced that for years he has been making up fictions like a petulant child about outcome determinative fraud in elections as an excuse to not have to face reality that he's a life-long fraud, coward, and loser - Which he externally mirrors back to front with his wannabe fascist authoritarian rhetoric. Which millions of other mentally weak willed and ignorant people in his cult who don't think for themselves and need authorities to tell them what to think, have also been parrating. All because of one guy's severe daddy issues on top of their own daddy issues.

Someone can be more of a traditional therapist to realize these things, but then mix in therapy with esotericism and you've got the strongest magnifying glass on getting to the core of underlying issues. It is like a hot knife through butter.

Written Insight - What is Occultism?

In the last insight we briefly touched on esotericism, and one cannot discuss said subject, at length or even briefly, without also mentioning what we called it's companion, which is occultism.

Because many people's minds have been partially raised in either cults at worst or somewhat junk food culture at best, they, and frankly most of mainstream culture often have very knee jerk dogmatic reactions to the word "occult".

Those heavily indoctrinated into the cults of the religions of empire, and well speak much on those later, instantly go to satanism, baphomet, and darkness when they hear the word. Or those, outside of growing up in cults but raised on junk food pop culture, have a very Hollywood ideal of what the occult is, which are people doing rituals in tau robes with hoods hanging over their faces within a pentagram candle circle or Kubrickian Eyes Wide Shut sex orgies with people in Venetian masks at aristocratic mansions. A tiny little bit of which has any correlation or merit to occultism, both examples featuring anonymized people, but both examples are more just people in cults that are cosplaying and/or larping with occult flavored fashion.

Occult primarily means hidden. with the classic example being during an eclipse, the sun and moon are capable of occulting each other. The latin word - obculto - means to cover, not only to hide, but also to guard against, protect, defend. So its hidden and guarded. The term "occult" itself simply means "hidden" or "secret." This doesn't so much mean shady dark back alley undercurrents, or scandalous dark web activity, as those things are just the exoteric criminal underground. Nor does it imply searching for hidden poltergeists in haunted mansions. Again, more fictional Hollywood exoteric influence. As generally, a similar word, we've now mentioned twice in this, cult, in a historical context does not always have a negative connotation, but in modernity, it certainly does. The term "occult" however doesn't necessarily imply anything negative in a modern context; it simply denotes hidden, and protected. And to add to our previous definition, which is a collaborator of the word occult, which is the word esoteric. Which means little known, and inside, so both esoteric and occult knowledge is what is hidden, inside, of you and all living beings.

One final important note that we will share here, through some of our own experience on said subject, is that like all things, Sturgeon's Law applies. And the 90% of occultism that is crap, is what's called popular occultism. Reddit is one of the coolest places on the internet but the occult subreddit thread is not occult. While real alchemy is an occult practice yes someone's social media page about the secrets of alchemy is not occult. As the content them it are easily fineable after half a dozen or so clicks. The real way one finds actual occult information or knowledge, is through a teacher and student relationship, with one who already has had experience in traditions that involve the pursuit of hidden esoteric knowledge, and can transfer said information to said student. Often associated with the search for deeper understanding of the mysteries of existence - stretching into esoteric areas that absolutely are spiritual and mainly deal with an individual's psychology. And how the individual's physiology related to the society psychology, and why that is important, we will highlight in the next one.

Written Insight - What is Esotericism?

We’re going to take a moment out of continuing to talk about our L-Curve Oligarchy series, and our slow-drip ongoing pro-democracy essay series, which I know you love by the way, they're so exciting, yet very important, to highlight a few specific definitions that may seem totally different or irrelevant, but are actually areas that our work focuses on and very much interweave with all larger societal issues, especially related to mental health, yet most people have no idea they do or even know what they are. So even though they are the closest thing to real Jedi stuff, very few people will listen to this, or care. The first one is what's called esotericism.

People think esoteric only means obscure, weird, or little known. Which to some extent it does. Esotericism primarily refers to a set of esoteric practices and knowledge that are typically intended for a select and initiated few rather than the general public. The term "esoteric" is derived from the Greek word "esōterikos," meaning "inner" or "hidden." But what it also means is inside. So what it fully means is what is inside in you, especially your mind, heart, both literal and archetypal, and what we could extend into conversation regarding higher states of being and both spirit or soul.

This is contrasted with Exoteric. Which means both comprehensible to or suited to the public; popular. Of or relating to the outside; external. So basically, what is popularly known or discussed is related to "the world out there". Just like how a smaller lesser known indie bands music will be superior to pop culture mainstream fluff music, which is inferior in quality, yet more widely known, in a dart board the esoteric can be thought of as the red center of the bullseye, which everything else radiates out from, while the exoteric is the rest of the board or more shallow outer area. To again go to a popular culture reference, esoteric knowledge is basically what the small number of Jedi know and practice, while exoteric knowledge is what the majority of the population, the non-Jedi know. It's accurate to say there is deeper substance and value in the esoteric over the exoteric and a more evolved human will become interested in the esoteric.

Those who become interested in the esoteric, which are few, usually follow it in an academic, intellectual, or historical context. Most never go any further than that. Yet those that do go further, some of whom, like the monks (or Jedi), choose to devote their whole life to such, can enter into study via praxis - meaning practical experience finding spiritual meaning and personal transformation through esoteric practices. With more advanced esoteric knowledge considered private or reserved for those who have undergone specific spiritual or intellectual training. Esotericism can be found in various cultural, religious, and philosophical traditions throughout history. Examples include very very old things such as, indigenous and pagan practices such as shamanism, alchemy, or newer systems such as certain aspects of Gnosticism, Kabbalah, or Sufism.

Since people's non-belief or belief of their faith systems drive all their other psychology, the juxtaposition between esoteric and exoteric are of foundational importance. After speaking briefly about the esoteric's collaborator, the occult, we'll highlight more about why these two things are of larger importance.

Written Insight - Our 2023 Bah Humbug To Holiday Glurdge

Numerous years ago we created this narration over some holiday footage we shot. And we've decided to re-bring it out this time of year in this context of us now creating these short podcast + channel insights, with some new and improved wording, and will likely continue to revisit it and re-modify it on a somewhat annual basis going forward. Here's the version for the lunisolar calendar which has been co-opted into the Roman BC/AD calendar by the religions of Empire which now claim we're about to enter the year 2024.

How does one choose to express their appreciation for the end of another solar cycle?

By thinking 'Tis the season for barrels of fake sentiment and slithery Christmas music about sleighs and snow, often sung in a kind of oleaginous voice?

Perhaps chugging gelatinous sanctioned drug sugar filled eggnog under mistletoe during yuletide celebrations wearing ugly sweaters in rooms full of people you can’t stand?

Engaging in zombie-like consumerist behavior buying generic corporatized presents historically from dying shopping malls or now more likely from highly automated un-unionized robot mega warehouses via the internet tubes?

Forcing your child to sit on a chubby jaundiced stranger's lap for cheesy photos while they cry their eyes out?

Turning your home into a gaudy Griswold display where the decorations are in full materialistic overload likely requiring auxiliary power to accommodate the exorbitant electricity bill?

Or fibbing to future generations by denigrating an Amanita Muscaria mushroom eucharist for achieving gnosis into a corporealized Coca-Cola version of a fiction named Santa Claus?

Bah Humbug to the splattered buckets of sticky sweet glurge and may the true origins of the indigenous pagan nature based winter solstice be un-diluted, de-occulted, and re-illuminated.

With all that being said, some of which was unusually esoterically truthful so you'll have to re-listen to it in order to get the downloads on what the hell you just heard, to conclude this in a more lamestream mainstream way - happy holidays to whatever you may or may not celebrate at this miraculous time of year.

Written Insight - What is the Fourth Estate?

The Fourth Estate - that evocative term, redolent of revolutions and ink-stained fingertips, is a phrase born not merely of political theory but of mythic necessity. It refers, traditionally, to the press, the media, the scribes of society, whose sacred charge is to speak truth to power, to bear witness, to ensure that the grand machinery of governance does not descend into the madness of unchecked authority.

But to truly understand the Fourth Estate, one must return to the original trinity from which it emerges. The first three estates in the old European order were: the clergy (those who mediated between the divine and the mortal), the nobility (those who wielded temporal power), and the commons (the masses, the people, the voiceless many). The Fourth Estate arose as an interloper, a rogue current - a force not born into privilege, but carved from the urgent need to observe, to interpret, to communicate.

The concept originated in Europe, and its roots can be traced back to the 18th century. The term "Fourth Estate", as the fourth branch after what are now the executive, legislative, and judicial, underscores the significant role of the press in a democratic society, emphasizing its responsibility to serve the public interest, provide accurate and reliable information, and act as a check on power. The idea behind the Fourth Estate is that the media, through journalism and reporting, acts literally as a fourth power alongside the traditional branches of government. It is seen as a force that can hold those in power accountable, inform the public, and contribute to the functioning of a healthy democracy through an educated voting electorate. And doing so by constantly providing valuable information, analysis, criticism through information dissemination, encouraging public accountability and transparency, fostering civic engagement, serving as a watchdog, sharing respectful debate + public opinion, and most importantly, speaking truth to power. Which can only be done by honoring what is called the Journalistic Oath.

In its ideal form, the Fourth Estate is the nervous system of democracy. It senses, transmits, and warns. It reveals what the powerful would prefer concealed. It holds the mirror up to civilization and asks, “Is this what we are?” When functioning properly, it is a  carrier of truthful stories, a bridge between worlds, a holder of the collective shadow.

Journalists do not exist in dictatorships. Not only do they exist in a more free democratic society, they are the fourth table leg of said society, always moving it forward toward less and less dysfunction. While even then, they never have it easy, we are currently sailing through dark and stormy seas for journalism throughout the entire world. Even the more free world. Because many of the institutions they work for, are doing basically the opposite of honoring their oaths, resulting in far too large an amount of the population getting either only partial information, incomplete information, skewed information, or malevolent propagandised information that equates to an oftentimes under educated voting electorate. In our age of echo chambers and corporate-owned narratives, the Fourth Estate has become a battleground. The line between journalism and propaganda has blurred. The ghost in the machine now writes headlines. What was once a sacred function has, in many quarters, been hijacked by spectacle, by ideology, by profit. This is the stale rotting corpse that is legacy media and even far too much of new media, which to put it simply, rarely tells the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. 

Yet the archetype remains. And you, me, all of us—by the very act of perceiving and narrating, we are now part of the Fourth Estate. Social media, for all its perils, has decentralized the scribal function. The myth of the single authoritative voice has shattered. Now it is a chorus, a cacophony. And although real independent journalists always should lead the way, any of us speaking truth to power will always be a revolutionary act.

Written Insight - Tax Cuts Redistribute Wealth

So before going forward we encourage you to listen to our insight from a few back on something called the L-Curve. Which they don't want you to know about. It's a secret key that unlocks the mysteries of the system. And in this insight we give you another secret cipher which you may or may not know. But it's the opposite of what is commonly thought.

The L-Curve is a visual representation of the extreme mis-distribution of wealth on the planet. As evident in third and even first world countries. In which basically 99.9% of people have little to no money and .01% have all the money - and if you've got $3 million you're still in the 99.9%.

If you go to Davos, which is a town in the Swiss Alps, which annually holds something called The World Economic Forum, where elements of the .01% of the world's rich meet, which you or I would never be invited to attend in the first place, but pretend we were... Their storefront marketing pitch is that "The World Economic Forum brings together government, businesses, and civil society to improve the state of the world". What they're really doing is conspiring about how they can continue to consolidate their power via their interconnected networks while turning everyone outside of those networks into a global slave class, helping themselves before the state of the world with some tiny spillover that would in any way help the rest of the world. The one thing they could do, over anything else, is a very basic and simple thing which they will not do through their own will. And that is allowing sensable tax policy to be implemented on them.

Poverty is a vicious cycle. When you're poor it's hard to get out of that and you get more and more desperate and do non honorable things. When you're rich, your money makes more money for you, passively. Being middle class is a most realistic goal for most of the population, landing somewhere in between. We are an American who was born in the last three months of the 1970's. From World War II to when we were born, the US had sensable tax policies which built the strongest middle class in the world. Yet, since we were born the United States has gone so far down into a funhouse mirror clown world with non-sensible tax policy, and the less free parts of the world have stupidly followed suit, that they have been going on our whole life. Specifically since around 1980, when president Ronald Wilson Regan (6 letters, 6 letters, 6 letters) changed conservative economic policy from only helping the rich into only helping the ultra rich. Trickle-down economics, which should be called golden shower economics, which has created a new generation of godzillionaire oligarchical robber barons and has been the conservative standard ever since.

Republicans hate government so much and have so little interest in using it to actually function for the people, that all they do when in office is tax cuts and deregulation. That's the best they've got. But what they never tell you is that these things only really help the oligarchs. Deregulating or removing things such as the Glass Steagall Act, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and abolishing inheritance taxes that create a healthy financial cyclical alchemical cycle within a democratic system. Spinning that reducing taxes stimulates economic growth which is one of their many big lies. Because they always disproportionately help corporate tax rates and only benefit extremely high-income individuals. So here goes the cipher:

Tax cuts are re-distributions of wealth from the poor, middle class, and even some of the rich, to the oligarchs.
Tax increases are re-distributions of wealth from the oligarchs to the poor, middle class, and even some of the rich.

Tax cuts, when given to everyone a little bit but mainly catering to the richest 1% of society, steal your money, to give to the oligarchs.
Tax increases, when not done to 99% and only done on the richest 1%, have a healthy redistribution of wealth from the oligarchs to you.

This is old news. It's been a long con. When you think Republicans deplorable financial policies, think RepubliCON. You are being conned by cons who claim they are helping you when in actuality they are stealing your money. When you hear someone wants to cut taxes, go one micron deeper and ask... primarily on who? If they say, we're going to give you a $500 to $5000 tax cut, but then bundled in that, we're going to give this oligarch a $50 to $500 million tax cut, there goes your wealth redistribution. And if you do actually look at what they do and not what they say, you will find they are attempting to redistribute wealth from you to an oligarch when all they really need to do to raise capital is to tax the oligarchs alone. And the proof that they are oligarchic puppets is that they never do that.

So the simple solution is to roll back Reagan's tax cuts, which would not affect 99% of society and only raise the tax rate and inheritance taxes on oligarchs. And the ironclad evidence to prove that all republicans and to be fair some of the conservative corporate democrats are puppets for the oligarchs, is that they will scream from the hills and lie through their teeth that anyone who attempts to do so are their old talking point of being marxist communists. We give credit to our friend Jason Cooper who we went to college with and pointed this out on our initial L-Curves insight - Sensible tax policy is to increase taxes on the morbid wealthy and redistribute that wealth back into society. Non sensible tax policy is to cut taxes on the morbid wealthy and increase taxes on working people.

In our last insight we gave a Lord of the Rings metaphor, so to extend that, think of the oligarchs as being Saruman and modern day Republicans as the financial Nazgul. And for a Star Wars metaphor, that oligarchs are Count Dooku and the modern day Republicans as being the financial Emperor's Royal Guard. Or to throw out another metaphor from classical literature, Robin Hood would steal from the rich to give to the poor. They have been stealing from the poor, especially the middle class, and the rich, to give to the oligarchic morbidly rich for coming up on half a century. We, and 99% of society, should prefer a kinder version of Robin Hood's original way.

Now that we've given this sobering spiel, we'll be heading over to what oligarchy does to the fourth estate and why legacy media is the past and not the future.

Written Insight - What is Oligarchy?

Everything we say is based on a hopefully forward thinking philosophical enlightenment view that people are fundamentally good and all people of a country should have the power to vote, through voting and liberal democracy, and a respect for the American constitution which should represent the majority of "We The People." This is why we choose to share insights through our work to whomever has ears to hear. Regardless of who you are or your class status. However, and as a reminder, see the website www.lcurve.org to see this as a simple graphical representation, because we live in a society where 99.9% have little of the money, and instead .01% of society, which are the godzillionaire oligarchs, have the majority of the money, the .01% of society which has the majority of the money don't think much of working people and do not want democracy. Yet, we are not naive and know that they're are others, those who intentionally support or those who have been fooled into supporting oligarchy who think the opposite of how we do. And we will reveal who they are in this insight.

Oligarchy is a small number of individuals who wield significant economic and political power in a society, often due to their substantial wealth and influence over key industries. This is a worldwide problem. The term is commonly associated with a concentration of power and influence in the hands of a small, privileged group of individuals or families. Oligarchs have considerable sway over political decisions, economic policies, and various aspects of society yet could care less about you. The characteristics of oligarchy is that it always uses its reach for the following, and put the word morbid in front of each of these - industry ownership, political influence, and international reach. This is the real deep state. Which fuels inequality, lack of transparency, and challenges the functioning of a fair and open society.

If you prefer Lord of the Rings metaphors, think of an oligarch as being Saruman. Or if you prefer Star Wars metaphors, think of an oligarch as being Count Dooku. Now we hear that and most people hear that and go yikes. Yet a very politically right wing person hears that and goes... great! Because conservatism historically defends hierarchy and works on behalf of the top of the hierarchy. While liberalism, historically, works more on behalf of the poor but really middle class. This is why democracy is inherently liberal, as it should represent everyone, regardless of class status. And over the decades, as oligarchy has re-increased, right wing politicians have worked less on behalf of the rich, and now only work on behalf of the morbidly rich. Certainly not all people are the same and we don't want equality of outcome, but we can still have a logical range of hierarchy which has minimal poverty and a powerful multicultural middle class that's not going to take anything away from urban, suburban, or rural white people.

Even though we are primarily green to blue affiliated and he's primarily red affiliated, we've just said the same thing that Alex Jones says - "The global elite want to create a slave class and make you have to eat bugs". And we'll surely do multiple future essays and insights around the concept of accurately identifying problems but implementing logical vs bat shit crazy solutions. But this can be previewed by sharing that there is a saying in comedy, which is to punch up and not down. Yet because regressivism and conservatism believes in an in group and an out group, with those in the in group being better than those in the out group, they only always implement policies that punch down at those not in the in group. We advocate for the most free society possible, across all groups, with the strongest middle class, so when we say, represent "all the people", modern day regressivism has degraded to the point that when it hears that it thinks poor or even middle class brown and black people in suburbs and cities who vote blue that are not in their minority in group and that's terrifying to them. Never mind the fact that there are more poor rural white people, in the horizontal line of the L-Curve, than any other demographic so we're also speaking on behalf of them. Yet here's the tough swallow for them... the entirety of the right wing and to be fair the most conservative elements of the left wing do not care about the lightly rich, let alone the middle class, let along the poor, and somewhat in Europe, more in the USA, and to an extreme degree in Russia, get into office only to protect white power and extreme oligarchic white wealth. Which is why if you ever see a brown or black right winger in those countries it's so hilarious cause they're so self hating. In other non-white parts of the world, which is the majority of the world's populace, very right wing politics is just about protecting power, wealth, and only representing the top of the socio economic hierarchy - regardless if it's in a country which has a primarily brown, black, or asian population.

So even though historical lite / moderate conservatism certainly deserves political respect, and is more represented in a third party or frankly the conservative side of the blue dysfunctional Democrats because the primary American conservative political party has de-evolved into a more extreme faction of the right wing which does not deserve respect - I.E. the GOP has transmuted into the train wreck of dysfunction, liberal democracy hating, GQP fascist MAGA red cult, the foundation of extreme conservatism has our whole life lied in being the defenders and foot soldiers for the oligarchs. Who always always always when in power, have enacted non-sensible tax policies who only help oligarchs, and no one else. And we'll get into that, in the next insight.

Written Insight - Income Distribution And Democratic Freedom

In a previous insight we spoke about something called the L-Curve. Which we would encourage you to listen to if you have not already done so. For it is a secret key which we have given you for your self development that decodes how modernity works which is not how we wish it would work. For through all of history, extreme morbid wealth has always and will always corrupt. It's also a foundational aspect to the problems of democratic society, because it gives a tiny amount of people, who are not honorable, and frankly also hostile to democracy, so much power.

Extreme morbid wealth has through all of history corrupted those who have it - that's been the way for thousands of years. America was founded with an enlightenment view of getting away from kings and oligarchs of old Europe. Because that was an old outdated societal operating system which sucked for basically everyone and the American founders knew that oligarchy and democratic society were diametrically opposed.

Historically, based on income, classes were separated into peasants, workers, aristocrats, nobels, and monarchy or royalty. To simplify that we'll now say that the 99.9% of people who don't have private jets and yachts and have to work for a living, the horizontal line of the L-Curve are the proletariat while the .01% of insanely morbidly rich people, the vertical line of the L-Curve, are the bourgeoisie or the oligarchs. It's a sad reality that most Americans can't even afford a $3000 medical bill, but if you're not in that camp and are quite well off with let's say as high as a few million bucks and are even first world rich, you are still part of this proletariat and far from an oligarch.

A democratic republic means a government elected by the people to represent the people. That means all the people, the majority proletariat with the tiny amount of bourgeoisie. In which we elect representatives that are to enact laws that benefit the people. Yet, if 99.9% of the proletariat don't have the majority of the money, what does that do to society? It sends us back to the medieval feudalism of old Europe, the modern version of which is a third world style dictatorship, by skewing society to only speak on behalf of the corrupted mind rotted oligarchs and their crony dictators they install, and not the people. In which you have elected representatives, comprising the three branches of government, as well as the fourth estate, the fourth branch of government which we'll get into, who pretend to represent the people in what they say but really in what they do sell out to the interests of the tiny few who have all the money, over the interests of the people.

In the most free and least corrupt countries in the world that have the most democratic freedom, there is a strong middle class and strong labor force. In the least free and most corrupt countries in the world, dictatorships, there is a massive miss-distribution of wealth where 99.9% of the people are dirt poor with no middle class and .01% have all the money and we're back to feudalism. This is by far most easily fixed through sensible tax policies. For the most free and least corrupt countries in the world have sensible tax policies, while the least free and most corrupt countries in the world have un-sensable tax policies. And after a stop off to give more insights on what oligarchy is we'll get into what those policies are.

Written Insight - Democracy, Our Favorite National Group Project, is Priceless


The underlying theme of all of our documentary-esq work, whether we are behind the camera or in front of it, or just narrating as audio only, is hopefully self-development of the individual. So Niles, why do you occasionally touch on politics? Which is the set of activities that are associated with making decisions in groups, or other forms of control relations among individuals. We realize it can be generally so exhausting, and would instead love to be talking only about higher level third eye related things and don't want to make all of our work solely about politics and we wish we could just fast forward to a point where it's sane, stable, and boring, and thus we do not focus on it at all, but due to the current landscape throughout the world and specifically in the United States, along with things that have been happening our whole life, American democracy, which has not even yet been fully achieved, as we typically have had kleptocracy, even that, is gravely under threat, and currently is more in the flavor of plutocratic oligarchy.

Moving toward real actual direct democracy, which belongs to everyone, is the group project that never ends. It’s where everyone gets a say, no one agrees, a way too large chunk of the team often doesn’t even show up, and yet somehow we mostly still pass the class. It's priceless because it gives power not to just the financially powerful, but to the person standing next to you in line. Regardless of their societal status or income and thus hands over the steering wheel of society - not to cunty kings, not to tyrants, but to all of us, collectively. It’s priceless because YOU have the ability to speak, protest, write, run for office, or support others who do. Of which many have zero reference points on how rare that has been through much of recent dark age history. The ability to disagree, very loudly, but still live near each other as neighbors is a good thing. Every generation's shared ownership, slow, flawed, fragile and frustrating as it can be, is always worth defending. And within it, every voice counts and if real cannot be bought, though many have tried and will continue to do so. Its ultimate beauty is that it can survive violence, revolutions, wanna be dictators, and even in its imperfections, it offers an evolving society. But most of all, it's 100x better than authoritarianism where not only does one not have any space for ability for self development, but also when the worst disagree with what you say or want you are disappeared into the shadows and at the time of this writing and speaking, there was a textbook wanna be authoritarian event in our country with military parade elements that was a pathetic flop and simultaneously there were thousands of cells of pro-democracy counter protests which were some of the largest in our nation's history. And that, pals, is exactly why evolving towards democracy is worth the struggle - when engaged in, it shines grassroots light on astroturf darkness and moving toward actual democracy requires not only such constant participation, but vigilance and refinement in order for it to evolve.

Voltaire certainly questioned if we're smart enough for it, and man... Many feel that way in the West in the first quarter of the 21st century, primarily cause of the deplorable state of the rebooting fourth estate, (meaning journalism and the media) but a well educated voting populace, which is desperately needing to continue being developed, can only continue to happen through the self-development of each individual that takes an active part in it. And we, as hopefully part of that, are unapologetically on team pro-democracy and recommend listening to our essay series on the subject. 

Written Insight - The L-Curve of Income Distribution

It is crucial when diagnosing the problems with society and culture in modernity to accurately identify said problems. Because you can't solve problems until you accurately identify them. And one of the absolute main problems with our lives today and over the past numerous thousands of years since the invention of money, on both an individual and societal level, is how wealth has been distributed. Or better said, mis-distributed.

Problems with environment, energy, race, class, education, banking, health, etc... all have economic causes and this is the major broken aspect to how money, the product of our energy, is working on the global Earth spiritual school campus at this time. In medieval feudalism, the king (one bloodline) had 96% off all the money, some landed gentry consisting of a few dozen families who were loyal to the most likely un-honorable king or queen’s family, had 3%, and then all the many thousands of people of the kingdom, who were dirt poor, had 1%. And believe it or not, little has actually changed since then in terms of income distribution.

If one were to ask homo-normalice what they think the curve of income distribution looks like throughout the parts of this planet which use money having adopted commerce, they would likely suspect it looks like either a straight line in a 45 degree angle, from poor to middle class to rich. Or maybe if one was more knowledgeable in economics they would realize that the curve is now starting to get much steeper than 45 degrees. Perhaps 60 or even 70 degrees from lower left to upper right. Well, none of the above are true. The curve is actually a backwards L shape folks. With it going nearly completely horizontal all the way across and then spiking further vertical to the stratosphere when hitting the top 99.9% percentile.

The world’s income distribution, especially evident in the U.S. is not a “Bell Curve”, it is an “L-Curve”. Never heard of this before? Well that’s not surprising, as this would never be revealed on stock market publications or any level of government or corporate media but instead on an off the beaten path website called lcurve.org which takes data from the US Census Bureau, The Internal Revenue Service, and the Economic Policy Institute and translates it brilliantly into a very basic graphical representation which is easy to digest. It’s important to note its data sources were notably lacking in data within the top 1% since we have a society that works best for the morbidly ultra rich minority by the morbidly rich minority who pay legions of Saul Goodman type accountants and lawyers to hide their money in offshore accounts. This is what the "Panama Papers" helped expose.

As long as we’ve visited this L-Curve site, and it’s been for over a decade now, it’s looked like one of those basic early 2000 era websites. Very plain and mainly just text based. At the top it shows a very simple and basic graphic of a stack of hundred dollar bills, which look like a grey brick in its ultra simplistic computer graphic representation on the green ground between two stick figure people. The stack represents the average U.S. household income across the population. There is a slider at the bottom of the small graphic which when adjusted, zooms the camera out to reveal the stick figures at the 50 yard line of a US football field. As one continues to zoom out we see the football field get smaller to be a view of hills and then mountains followed by open sky and then what looks like the beginning of space. With a single horizontal line going across the field sideways and then continuing vertically up and up all the way into what seems like lower Earth orbit. On the scale of the football field graph the bottom 99.9% of the population measure their incomes as stacks of $100 bills in inches. The top .01% measure their incomes as stacks of $100 bills feet or even miles high. The millions of folks who make over $30,000 per year are in the top 1% of the planet's wealth, sure, but within that class is only the beginning of the horizontal line of the L-Curve. On the vertical line of the curve is the total wealth of the tiny amount of people in the vertical spike which nearly equals the total wealth of the rest of the population combined and in there are 6 families who alone have half the wealth on the planet.

Of course there are great rich folks out there doing some good in the world. We’re not talking about those who have a few million bucks. If you do and you’re using it to hopefully share resources to help others via your community then jolly good. But it should be noted that even most of these rich people are also getting screwed in the same bucket with the middle class and poor. For the vertical L-Curve spike shouldn't even be classified as rich. It should be classified as parasitic against the 99.9%. For most working class folks, which is you, me, and everyone we know, have zero idea how staggeringly much money a billion dollars is. It’s 1000 times larger than a million and there are currently single individuals whose net worth is capping over 200 billion dollars.

The published wealth of billionaires, who should actually be called Godzillionaris of course, is typically estimated by their holdings in their own companies. These estimates do not include their typically vast diversified investments. It's true that there are differences among different kinds of income, but political and economic power derives from wealth. Raising many questions about modern societal life. Leading us to dare ask the incredible powerful powerful powerful one word question...WHY? Why does the wealth (which we all help produce) go so disproportionately to the few at the top? Why, in a prosperous economy, is there so much poverty while at the same time having a dynamic where one individual with a dick rocket could almost single handedly pay for every college education - if he wanted to. Why has the lion’s share of the growth in economic booms gone almost exclusively to those in the vertical spike while wages have stagnated?

Many of these questions will be answered in our future insights but the L-Curve highlights political questions around the concentration of wealth producing concentration of power that is fundamentally incompatible with democracy and free and open society. For you can’t have a democracy without a strong middle class.

Written Insight - What is Spirituality?

To give a simple yet accurate answer to what spirituality is we must first accurately define what spiritual is: A standard milk toast definition of spiritual is "of related to the spirit" which is a lukewarm definition at best. Our personal definition of spiritual is... drumroll.... "full spectrum nature."

If you respect and appreciate nature, you are evolved enough to appreciate the spiritual world. The natural queendom and kingdom, of which human beings are a part. Yet most people in technological first world modernity, and I know this is ironic as we say this from our office with monitors, cameras, computers, and color grading panels, most people have little to NO IDEA about what nature is fully capable of. They associate it only as the natural material world, like one would see from a David Attenborough documentary. Which are only the physical aspects of nature. And while the physical natural world is awesome, yet brutal because being in the food chain is brutal, and material nature is beautiful and amazing and awesome, the vast vast majority of nature is the deeper, higher, larger, greater, more complex "super-natural" aspects of it - from the infinitesimally small to the galactically cosmically large. Including what is beyond the five senses and what science still has much to learn from. So the spiritual world is the full spectrum of nature, from the material to the non-physical.

Since human beings are part of the mammalian queendom kingdom, we are part of nature, and we have mental and physical software and hardware, which, for millions of years, has been designed not just to survive within nature, but to interface with the full spectrum of nature - the spiritual. Because we are absolutely spiritual beings having a human experience, not the other way around.

If we give a very simple modern definition of spirituality one of which would be "related to the human spirit", that then means we must define what the human spirit is. And we'll get more into spirit and soul in future essays and insights... but generally, it refers to matters of the human mind, heart, and will through spirit or soul and their connection to something beyond the physical or material world. The human spirit is the incorporeal part of woman man. What you are, beyond your body. Because we are not exclusively and only the meat suit that is our body. And the fact that we are spiritual beings, with a human spirit, like all lifeforms, that aspect of yourself is what can interface with the more full spectrum of nature, hence,

spirituality is our ability to interface with nature and especially the larger, deeper, higher, greater spectrum of nature. Plane and simple. Any concepts like oneness, awareness, unity, meaning, the divine, god, existence, personal growth, consciousness, searching, as above so below, seeking, moral and ethical guidance, explaining, path walking, etc... all are attempts to interface with a more full spectrum of nature. So the pursuit of a deeper connection or understanding of the self, the universe, and often a higher power or transcendent reality which inevitably involves exploring questions related to the meaning and purpose of life, the nature of existence, and one's relationship with something greater than oneself will lead us back to nature. It's a personal and often subjective journey, and it can encompass a wide range of beliefs, practices, and experiences.

This subject could be a 10,000+ hour conversation, but as we wind this simple summary down, we will say, if a system one is within is heavily removed from nature, and thus not made by nature, then problems and Sturgeon's Law set in. A lot of smart, educated, science appreciating, and intellectual secular people can be turned off by the word spiritual, because they instantly associate it with religion and the problems of religion. And it's been very intentional that we have not included religion in these definitions. Yet, although we need to define religion, and how it differs from organized religion, which we will do in a separate insight, we will say the phrase "spiritual but not religious" has validity, as spirituality may or may not be associated with organized religious systems, many of which, if we are truly honest, have had, for thousands of years, a very very dysfunctional track record. Separate from organized religion, we also have many systems that claim to be separate from organized religion yet spiritual but are in fact... also incredibly dysfunctional, if not outright garbage. One can listen to 100 "spiritual" podcasts or channels and 90 of them will be crap. So regardless of what any system is doing, big or small, organized or not, if it is not leading to deeper interconnectedness with our natural environment IE... the natural world, and is instead replacing those things with other things, we have red flags.

So, on a final note, one of the least corrupt places to look in the modern world for the least corrupt spirituality and spiritual practice, is what the still remaining indigenous cultures throughout the world are doing. As it's not hard to say, that they are much much much more in touch with nature and especially full spectrum nature.

Written Insight - An Introduction to The Seven Liberal Arts

The seven liberal arts (from Latin liberalis "free" and ars "art or principled practice") are a classification of knowledge that dates back to ancient Greece. Liberal arts takes the term art in the sense of a learned skill rather than specifically the fine arts. Such a course of study contrasts with those that are principally vocational, religious, or technical.

Although the term "liberal arts" for an educational curriculum dates back to classical antiquity in the West, the meaning of them has adjusted over time to be expanded upon, with the modern sense of the term usually covering all the natural sciences, formal sciences, social sciences, arts, and humanities. They were (and still are) essential for a free person (liberalis) to be educated in, as they were believed to contribute to one's ability to engage in civic life and intellectual discourse. The seven liberal arts are typically divided into two groups: called the trivium and the quadrivium.

Trivium:

a. Grammar: The study of language, including its structure, syntax, and semantics.

b. Logic (or Dialectic): The study of reasoning, argumentation, and critical thinking.

c. Rhetoric: The art of effective communication and persuasive speaking and writing.

Quadrivium:

a. Arithmetic: The study of numbers, quantity, and mathematical operations.

b. Geometry: The study of shapes, sizes, and properties of space.

c. Music: The study of harmony, rhythm, and the mathematical aspects of sound.

d. Astronomy: The study of celestial bodies and their movements.

These seven liberal arts formed the foundation of education in the classical world and were later incorporated into the curriculum of Renaissance education. They were considered the basis for a well-rounded and intellectually capable individual and they prepared students for more advanced studies in fields like philosophy, theology, and the sciences.

Now note, those two last sentences were in the past tense, because for some reason, most modern folks dont know of this classical system. We personally make a special effort to ask most teachers we meet about the Trivium and Quadrivium and they, as modern educators, have usually never heard of them either. So even though this is a timeless foundation, and since this is the very first time you've likely heard of them, ask yourself, why might that be? We are very mixed on conspiracy theories, with some being true and far too many being hot garbage, but we do think there has been an effort to suppress this educational system from the average person - Joe sixpack or Sally soccer mom. There's absolutely been a long effort by the American wrong wing to denigrate the word liberal, when it literally means free. So more on this system and its potential suppression in future insights, because at no time in the past present or future will this system not be a foundationaly important aspect of other educational systems, emphasizing critical thinking, communication skills, a broad base of knowledge, and by far most importantly, allowing any willing individual the ability to teach themselves.

Written Insight - Mind, Heart, and Will (part 1)

The phrase "mind, heart, and will" encapsulates essential aspects of human consciousness and motivation. It basically means, what you think, what you feel, and what you do. Each component represents a distinct facet of our inner selves, and together, they play a significant role in shaping our thoughts, emotions, decisions, and actions.

Mind: The mind represents our intellectual and cognitive capacity. It encompasses our ability to think, reason, analyze, and process information. It's where we store knowledge, make sense of the world, and engage in critical thinking. Allowing us to solve problems, learn new things, and adapt to our surroundings. It's the seat of our thoughts, ideas, and creativity. A strong and well-developed mind is essential for making informed decisions, understanding complex concepts, and retention of information.

Heart: The heart symbolizes our emotional and affective dimension. It's where our feelings, passions, and empathy reside. Love, joy, sadness, anger, and all the other emotions we experience are rooted in the heart. The heart is the source of our connections with others, driving our capacity for compassion, empathy, and relationships. It guides us in making decisions based on our values and what we care deeply about. A compassionate and open heart is essential for forming meaningful relationships and for finding purpose and fulfillment in life.

Will: The will refers to our determination, self-discipline, and volition. It represents our capacity to set goals, make choices, and take action. It's where we find the strength to persevere through challenges and obstacles, to exercise self-control, and to work toward our aspirations. The will is the driving force behind our commitment and motivation, enabling us to turn our desires and intentions into concrete actions. A strong will is crucial for achieving personal and professional success, as it provides the necessary grit and determination to overcome difficulties and pursue long-term goals.

"Mind, heart, and will" represent a trinity of human consciousness and motivation and is often invoked in discussions of ethics and morality. It suggests that our decisions and actions should be guided not only by rational thinking (mind) but also by our emotional and moral compass (heart), and that we must possess the willpower to act in alignment with our values. A balanced and harmonious integration of the mind, heart, and will is crucial for personal growth, decision-making, and achieving one's fullest potential. When these aspects work in concert, they remind us of the importance of cultivating a well-rounded and balanced approach to a more holistic and fulfilled life, where intellect, emotions, and determination coexist and harmonize to drive us toward our goals and lead us to a more meaningful existence.

Written Insight: The Trifecta of Reading, Writing, and Speaking

The trifecta of reading, writing, and speaking represents three interconnected and absolutely foundationally essential skills in the realm of communication and language development. Together, they play a pivotal role in education, professional success, and personal growth. In order to write well, one must read well, and in order to speak their own words well, one must also both read well and write well. Doing so has always been and will always be essential for the aspiring or actual philosopher.

Obviously, outside of perhaps the deaf or mentally impaired, we all speak. To other individual people and rarely under special circumstances in front of audiences or if professional, in front of audiences on a regular basis. However, what far too many folks, and even well educated college graduated folks, really dont do that much of, is read. After assignments in college, the reading slows, and then into work life we only read for work related purposes or in small doses of what we see on our phones. Which will not suffice.

When we say "foundationally essential to the philosopher" we mean throughout their whole life. Speaking, reading, and writing and many dont want to hear this, but that means we should be reading books, on the regular, our whole life. "Gulp" or "Ugh!" people say... because reading a book, especially a more dense one, is work and not leisure. Sure there are trashy romance novels out there which are essentially narrative softcore porn, and there are plenty of garbage disinformation books as well. A great documentary can be vastly superior to a bad book, but as a whole, the depth of books is much more vast than the depth of what one gets from the screen. With either fiction or nonfiction. It's common knowledge that when a book is adapted into a film the book is always better than its stripped down more lite screenplay equivalent. Because the medium of pros - words on a page allow, as a whole, for a deeper well to pull and comprehend concepts from, while also increasing vocabulary, acquiring knowledge, and to inspire critical thinking.

When one finishes their work day it's much more common to want to watch than read a book isn't it? The wife and I are both hard working professionals and we are known to sit down and watch a show in a larval like state, just like many couples in their evening time. I've always read almost exclusively non fiction and she's almost exclusively always read fiction here and there, but as of late, her ratio of reading to watching has biased way more toward reading and at the time of this recording, she oftentimes prefers to spend her evenings reading now reading over watching some so so long drawn out show that half way through you wonder why you're still watching and question the time commitment you have already invested in it.

Reading is the input, and writing and speaking are output. A realistic ratio is that one likely has inputted, meaning read, 100x more than they will write. So in order to write well, and well often, one must be constantly reading. Column, articles, essays, research papers, books, novels, etc... The good news is, and we'll devote a future insight into this, is that due to technology, reading can also now mean text to speech or audiobooks which allow for the potential to increase the amount of time one can read because they allow for more of a multitasking dynamic. As listening is something you can do while gardening, or commuting, etc... Because we have spent 20+ years listening to non fiction audiobooks, that has allowed us to now spend the last 5+ years writing essays and are now also moving into these shorter insights. And there's no way we could have done that, or even think of writing feature length screenplays or novels without a prior long history of reading, and then writing, and then speaking. This trifecta represents a powerful set of skills that are integral for empowering the individual to express themselves, acquire knowledge, engage with others, navigate the complexities of modern life, and build up a unique body of work. Because if you input well, you will output well.

Written Insight: The Importance of Asking Questions

Is the majority of your time spent around boring and uninteresting people that energetically drain you? Well... you are not alone. We personally are constantly amazed how many people we interact with socially, or in any environment where it might be a getting to know others dynamic, how few people ask us much beyond the basic "how you doing?" or "what do you do?" questions. If you have a lot of people in your life that ask you multiple questions in conversation, consider yourself lucky. In America, surface level questions may be peppered a bit, but continuing questions, let alone deeper ones, are rare.

In order to have a superior exchange over the narrow canyons of average thought, discourse cannot be unilateral, if you know that word - being any doctrine or agenda that supports one-sided action. It must be a reciprocal discussion, of give and take, statement and question, to rise up out of a shallow canyon and see some level of horizon one must ask instead of only speak. For we have two ears and one mouth and they are to be used proportionately.

Women are usually better socially, and it's common for men to lose more relationships later in life and then get lonely and shrivel up and die earlier than their female counterparts. Any centrarian living in a blue zone knows that their social lives and community are a key to their life longevity. We know several men, who are very well paid working professionals and the husbands of our wife's friends, that we might see only once every few years, who on the rare occasion we see them, we ask them maybe a dozen questions over the first hour or two, and they never ask us anything. So at some point we stop asking and the conversation stops and as a result they simply dont know much about us, even though we've technically known them at a surface level for over a decade.

Due to the narcissism epidemic, many just want to talk about themselves and what’s going on in their own lives, perhaps not even tracking how much others in the conversation are interested in what they are saying. To keep another pair of ears interested during a discussion at a party, or around a dinner table, or even in a work environment, the speaking party must not just project, but also be willing to receive. Their ears must function as much if not more than their mouth. This entails asking multiple if not frequent questions of others. This is the origin of a bad date. Where two people are at a restaurant and one of them is a blabbermouth valley girl Chatty Cathy doll, unilaterally explaining away all aspects of various social minutia of their life without the reciprocation of ever wanting to know anything about the other which they are supposedly there to get to know. Shallow people just want to talk about themselves, so talking to unsophisticated members of especially the opposite sex in social environments, which pre-internet took place 99% of the time in dens of alcohol distribution, can far too often consist of just nodding and pretending looking one is interested.

Developed by the Greek philosopher, Socrates, the Socratic Method is a dialogue between a teacher and their students, instigated by the continual probing questions of the teacher, in a concerted effort to explore the underlying thoughts that shape the student's life choices. In school, university, or the professional workplace it's common for new recruits to have a fear based mindset and be scared to ask because the moment they ask reveals they don’t know something. In that environment, this will surely be to a potential group of onlookers, fellow students or colleagues. Yet, wanting to know is engaging and lowers the threshold for others to also get involved in the discourse and then usually improves the overall quality of the learning and/or work experience.

When you ask another person "get to know them" questions it shows not only that you have a growth-based mindset, but most importantly, that you care. Because the act of asking questions is a fundamental and powerful tool for human improvement, exploration, and progress - regardless of being in a formal educational context, asking gathers information, facilitates learning, drives innovation, broadens thinking, challenges held beliefs, strengthens communication, allows for problem solving, fosters creativity, encourages adaptation, improves relationships. And sometimes such things can come from the most unexpected people or places, such as from the janitor instead of the Socratic philosophy professor. Those who ask others things, regardless of status, know life provides a never ending education allowing for the ability to be informed, engaged, and enriched.

The quality of your life is the quality of your questions. Why would one ever stop asking questions? We'll get into the importance etymology, the study of the origin of words, in another insight, but it's worth noting that the etymology of Asking = AS KING.

Written Insight: Podcast Update + Channel Reboot

Our primary YouTube channel has consisted of our independent documentary film outputs - basically our directing work which is, for the most part, self financed and we shoot during our travels, with us rarely on screen, instead usually behind the camera, and sometimes heard as narrator. We also write and narrate essays which serve as incubation writings for our documentary projects, which were once included also in this channel but we came to find worked best broken out into a separate channel called "An Infinite Path" which is named after our podcast that's comprised of those audio narrated essays and release there prior to us potentially doing the long and laborious task of adding a visual component to some of those writings. We had about a year ago also experimented with rebooting this channel to also include our documentary/journalistic/cinematic style street photography, but also deemed that worked best as a separate channel called "Philosophical Photography" which corresponds to our photo blog. So we now have 3 separate channels - each updated periodically. Hooray!

In the meantime, this channel has basically remained a random collection of our past live-action film projects and things we've shot. But with us usually being the one behind the camera and thus out of sight and that is now going to change as we reboot it again, because we are now going to be making the majority of the video uploads here just like this one of us talking on screen, putting the You in YouTube, with us speaking into camera.

All of our essay writings and still and moving work have tried to have underlying themes of life insight, self development, and human beings' relationship to the natural world. This includes sub-categories such as mental health and physical health, ecology, philosophy, spirituality, pro democratic political philosophy, more authentic ways of living and being, etc... Not fluff, not gossip, not film criticism, not how to's, not gear/hardware reviews but instead areas of hopefully more philosophical deeper substance about life which our past/present future documentaries hope to focus on. Outside of travels, we also work a day job and thus spend quite a bit of time on the homefront working from our office shed which you are now seeing here. So many of these subjects that we are interested in, and have made documentary outputs surrounding, are able to be brought more efficiently to you by simply turning the camera on ourselves and having us directly talking about them. So the idea is to now use this channel with us doing so in short length videos consisting of life insights from past, present, future works that you may find valuable, filmed with the same hardware we would shoot one of our documentary projects on. Still peppering in future doco trailers, excerpts, and shorter form films here, but with those being done on a more sporadic basis while our speaking into camera here will now be the majority of the content of this channel and should allow for more value added here along with more regular content to both this channel and our related podcast as well.

We've learned a lot through our life work, study, praxis, and experiences and although we still have much to learn, creating and putting content out there, helps us learn by sharing with you.